Boxdin
Vannin.com logo
We host with and recommend Your-Site.Com - This site works best with FireFox - this site is powered by UBBCentral



Site Navigation


Advertisements
Recent Posts
What can you tell me about the 70's GMC Rally Van?
by keystonekid1978
0 seconds ago
Air Conditioning Problems w/ '92 "Sporty Shorty" Chevy Conversion Van
by kwbryan
4 minutes 42 seconds ago
Old Photos
by Wizard78
9 minutes 37 seconds ago
Cerberus, Shenandoah Valley Vans
by Wizard78
10 minutes 7 seconds ago
"Super Bold" Flare kit/spoiler?
by keystonekid1978
10 minutes 27 seconds ago
vent visor or rain gaurd
by Wizard78
10 minutes 33 seconds ago
Floridian Vanner
by frscke1
29 minutes 50 seconds ago
New member
by Wizard78
Today at 11:54 AM
Jokes Thread
by starwars
Today at 11:45 AM
41st National Truck-in, July 10-14 2013, Old Washington, OH
by pirate
Today at 11:42 AM
Featured Links




Cluster Map
Locations of visitors to this page
Page 11 of 18 < 1 2 ... 9 10 11 12 13 ... 17 18 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#448004 - February 23rd 2011 1:58 am Re: Engines - Ford vs GM [Re: frscke1]
Knightjp Offline
enthusiast

Registered: September 04th 2010 3:04 pm
Posts: 343
Loc: Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Originally Posted By: frscke1
?....I have no idea


Log onto ford.com chevy.com ect ect and talk to there teks give them your applacation of what you are going to with it see what they say
Good Idea smile

Looks like I'll have to join another forum or something to get the answer.
I posted this question on a major Automotive forum and didn't get much help there.. Have a look ...
Automotive Forums

Top
AdSense
#448010 - February 23rd 2011 6:04 am Re: Engines - Ford vs GM [Re: Knightjp]
NateNCBV Offline

Administrator

Registered: August 23rd 2005 12:00 pm
Posts: 20328
Loc: Brooklyn Park, Maryland, USA
I've read here and there that a pushrod engine will provide more torque low in the RPM band while a modular or overhead cam engine's power comes in higher in the RPM band.
_________________________
Nate Breece (Nate the skate)
2%
North Chesapeake Bay Vans
A-100 Van Association
Honorary Canadian(You Hoser!)
--------------
1994 Dodge B250 Elk Conversion (5.2L/A518)
1985 Dodge B150 "Burnin' Desire" (5.2L/A727)

Top
#448019 - February 23rd 2011 6:25 am Re: Engines - Ford vs GM [Re: NateNCBV]
Knightjp Offline
enthusiast

Registered: September 04th 2010 3:04 pm
Posts: 343
Loc: Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Originally Posted By: Natetheskate
I've read here and there that a pushrod engine will provide more torque low in the RPM band while a modular or overhead cam engine's power comes in higher in the RPM band.

Then maybe my calculations were wrong.
Is there any way of confirming that??

Top
#449330 - February 28th 2011 6:12 am Re: Engines - Ford vs GM [Re: frscke1]
Knightjp Offline
enthusiast

Registered: September 04th 2010 3:04 pm
Posts: 343
Loc: Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Originally Posted By: frscke1
?....I have no idea
Log onto ford.com chevy.com ect ect and talk to there teks give them your applacation of what you are going to with it see what they say


Logged on into fordforums.com and posted a query there. Maybe I posted too much, I don't know... but there were alot of views, no replies.

Thanks for the replies on this thread guys... you've been a big help.
I guess I'm gonna have to just go with my preferred choice and hope its good or settle for a V8 engine from a current van... 5.4L Triton 16-valve Flex-Fuel V8 or 6.0L Vortec V8.....

Top
#449417 - February 28th 2011 1:24 pm Re: Engines - Ford vs GM [Re: Knightjp]
Knightjp Offline
enthusiast

Registered: September 04th 2010 3:04 pm
Posts: 343
Loc: Dubai, United Arab Emirates
I just came across this on the Ford site....
F150 EcoBoost torture test

Probably proof of how strong Ford's engines are....

Does anyone have something similar from GM????

Top
#449420 - February 28th 2011 1:52 pm Re: Engines - Ford vs GM [Re: Knightjp]
NateNCBV Offline

Administrator

Registered: August 23rd 2005 12:00 pm
Posts: 20328
Loc: Brooklyn Park, Maryland, USA
Those EcoBoost engines are the next generation of Ford engine. I think they are replacing the Triton family of engines.
_________________________
Nate Breece (Nate the skate)
2%
North Chesapeake Bay Vans
A-100 Van Association
Honorary Canadian(You Hoser!)
--------------
1994 Dodge B250 Elk Conversion (5.2L/A518)
1985 Dodge B150 "Burnin' Desire" (5.2L/A727)

Top
#449424 - February 28th 2011 2:04 pm Re: Engines - Ford vs GM [Re: Knightjp]
frscke1 Offline
pooh-bah

Registered: June 26th 2010 7:35 pm
Posts: 6543
Loc: San Diego California
But how many engines did they go thru before they filmed ?

On a advertisement like that they always put up the best one they got right...every maker will pat themselves on their backs.

Im not sayin Ford,Dodge or Chevy is better.....it is up to the application of your use ....each has its own benefits
_________________________
ONE FOR THE DIRT & ONE FOR THE STREETS
http://www.thundersgarage.com/readers.html
ADRENALIN BY THE GALLON
'93 CHEVY G30 454 4X4 SPORTVAN EXT 146 WB
'92 CHEVY G30 454 BEAUVILLE EXT 146 WB


Top
#449446 - February 28th 2011 3:18 pm Re: Engines - Ford vs GM [Re: Knightjp]
Knightjp Offline
enthusiast

Registered: September 04th 2010 3:04 pm
Posts: 343
Loc: Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Originally Posted By: Knightjp

Does anyone have something similar from GM????
I agree that every manufacturer will always highlight only the strong points of their product; but I do believe that this is a genuine test.

A UK based program 'Fifth Gear' mentioned about how intense the testing was done on the Volvo based engine for the then new Focus. Apparently they ran the engine at max revs; just before the redline, till the engine did about 100,000 miles. Even after all that abuse, still the engine remained as strong and gave exceptional figures at the dyno.
'Fifth Gear's reviews are independent from the manufacturer and accurate, so we can take their word for it on that.

Now I wish there was a similar test from GM or an independent test for both.

Top
#449451 - February 28th 2011 3:27 pm Re: Engines - Ford vs GM [Re: Knightjp]
wrcsixeight Offline
veteran

Registered: April 30th 2010 8:57 pm
Posts: 1650
Loc: San Diego
I think you're trying to pick fly shit from the pepper.

Most engines, whatever make, with regular maintenance will last longer then the vehicle they are put into.

Find the one which produces the torque in the rpm range you want, and can be made to fit in your application.

Top
#449454 - February 28th 2011 3:29 pm Re: Engines - Ford vs GM [Re: Knightjp]
frscke1 Offline
pooh-bah

Registered: June 26th 2010 7:35 pm
Posts: 6543
Loc: San Diego California
Didnt Mobil 1 do a advertisement to the point that they ran the motor high rpm's ...drained out all the oil and ran it again w/ no oil ?

How many engines did they go thru before they got the results they needed for an advertisement ?


Edited by frscke1 (February 28th 2011 3:39 pm)
Edit Reason: add-on
_________________________
ONE FOR THE DIRT & ONE FOR THE STREETS
http://www.thundersgarage.com/readers.html
ADRENALIN BY THE GALLON
'93 CHEVY G30 454 4X4 SPORTVAN EXT 146 WB
'92 CHEVY G30 454 BEAUVILLE EXT 146 WB


Top
Page 11 of 18 < 1 2 ... 9 10 11 12 13 ... 17 18 >



Moderator:  Lil_Ed, nautic1 
Upcoming Events
Instagram Feed
Who's Online
2 registered (keystonekid1978, VanPLan), 9 Guests and 97 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
kwbryan, GoKartVanMan, SuperRob, Rockinrednek, Margaret
6696 Registered Users
Top Posters (30 Days)
Wizard78 383
frscke1 343
HighwayStar 333
Uncle_Fester 242
NateNCBV 206
lukester 196
keystonekid1978 182
Lee7673 178
newkirkinc1 153
al55 109
Forum Stats
6697 Members
66 Forums
26247 Topics
424419 Posts

Max Online: 177 @ May 08th 2013 5:58 am

This site works best with
Download Firefox