|
|
#447947 - February 22nd 2011 10:07 pm
Re: Engines - Ford vs GM
[Re: motorjunkie]
|
pooh-bah
Registered: June 26th 2010 7:35 pm
Posts: 6218
Loc: San Diego California
|
They are more expensive to BUY, not to own and maintain. Good luck, Van on! I AGREE
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#447977 - February 23rd 2011 12:30 am
Re: Engines - Ford vs GM
[Re: frscke1]
|
enthusiast
Registered: September 04th 2010 3:04 pm
Posts: 343
Loc: Dubai, United Arab Emirates
|
They are more expensive to BUY, not to own and maintain. Good luck, Van on! I AGREE So I take it that the other two (Ford & Dodge) are cheaper to buy but more costlier in terms of maintenance....
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#447989 - February 23rd 2011 1:09 am
Re: Engines - Ford vs GM
[Re: frscke1]
|
enthusiast
Registered: September 04th 2010 3:04 pm
Posts: 343
Loc: Dubai, United Arab Emirates
|
if you want beef buy beef...but pay for the good cut Thanks for the advice... The van is VW LT... Its German which means its going to be German quality metal. Couple that with the weight of the equipment I'll be loading in the back, I needed an engine that provides good enough torque so I don't need to rev it as much to get going. My question is... which of the two (pushrod or modular) gives more torque???
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 registered (pirate),
2
Guests and
79
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Registered: March 23rd 2006 12:00 pm
Posts: 957
|
|
6619 Members
66 Forums
25961 Topics
420697 Posts
Max Online: 177 @ May 08th 2013 5:58 am
|
|
|